<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1D mark IV and the Nikon D3s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/</link>
	<description>Photography Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 05:11:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tonyeckersley</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/comment-page-1/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>tonyeckersley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/?p=458#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>My mistake, I meant to say D300s - who knows what I was thinking. Sorry

I was speculating that the 1D mark IV would have a higher res count than the 7D (before the 1Dmk4 was announced) because Canon just seem to be cramming pixels left and right (not a good thing) and I was hoping they may increase the resolution of the video - but I knew that wouldn&#039;t happen.

Maybe you&#039;re right about 1080p. It&#039;s far from perfect on any Canon cameras right now.

But regardless, it&#039;s a great time for technology, and competition will really push all camera makers to make better cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake, I meant to say D300s &#8211; who knows what I was thinking. Sorry</p>
<p>I was speculating that the 1D mark IV would have a higher res count than the 7D (before the 1Dmk4 was announced) because Canon just seem to be cramming pixels left and right (not a good thing) and I was hoping they may increase the resolution of the video &#8211; but I knew that wouldn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re right about 1080p. It&#8217;s far from perfect on any Canon cameras right now.</p>
<p>But regardless, it&#8217;s a great time for technology, and competition will really push all camera makers to make better cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damen Stephens</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/comment-page-1/#comment-4347</link>
		<dc:creator>Damen Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/?p=458#comment-4347</guid>
		<description>Wow - I thought the D700 didn&#039;t have any video, let alone finding out it has a 720/24p mode which looks good.  The Canon Eos 1d Mk IV DOESN&#039;T &quot;trump&quot; the resolutions on the 7d (don&#039;t know why you thought it would) they are the same (resolution-wise).  It is becoming a general consensus I believe that the Canons do not deliver a true 1080p resolution, and that, in fact the 720p proffered by Nikon may very well be the equivalent resolution (and without as much moire and aliasing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I thought the D700 didn&#8217;t have any video, let alone finding out it has a 720/24p mode which looks good.  The Canon Eos 1d Mk IV DOESN&#8217;T &#8220;trump&#8221; the resolutions on the 7d (don&#8217;t know why you thought it would) they are the same (resolution-wise).  It is becoming a general consensus I believe that the Canons do not deliver a true 1080p resolution, and that, in fact the 720p proffered by Nikon may very well be the equivalent resolution (and without as much moire and aliasing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 1D mark V and the Nikon D3s</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/comment-page-1/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 1D mark V and the Nikon D3s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/?p=458#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 1D mark V and the Nikon D3s    Last night Nikon announced the Nikon D3s, a camera that had been rumored for a while with more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 1D mark V and the Nikon D3s    Last night Nikon announced the Nikon D3s, a camera that had been rumored for a while with more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 1D mark IV and the Nikon D3s</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/canon-1d-mark-iv-and-the-nikon-d3s/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 1D mark IV and the Nikon D3s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonyeckersley.com/?p=458#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 1D mark IV and the Nikon D3s    Last night Nikon announced the Nikon D3s, a camera that had been rumored for a while, with more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 1D mark IV and the Nikon D3s    Last night Nikon announced the Nikon D3s, a camera that had been rumored for a while, with more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

